STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS
Strategic Planning Process -
Fall 2008
CSO Summary of Comments and Recommendations
The Classified Staff
Organization greatly appreciates the opportunity to be
involved in the strategic planning process. As an integral
part of Lewis-Clark State College, we feel we have valuable
contributions to make and we thank the administration for
their willingness to listen. We hope to continue to be
contributors to the process for years to come.
We respectfully submit the
following comments and recommendations:
-
Workload~
We continue to support
the need for a review of staff workload (PG-09-11.2).
We are cognizant of the requests made by many areas this
year for additional support staff but we feel through
review of existing workload we could ensure that
employees are working in pay grades that are
commensurate with their workload, as well as arrange
collaboration with departments to share support based on
need and availability. Due to the economic situation
facing the State of Idaho, we are concerned that a
possible reduction in personnel could lead to increased
workloads in many departments on campus. We encourage
careful consideration when asking staff with already
heavy workloads to “do more with less” at the risk of a
reduction in quality. Additionally, increased
compensation is suggested for those assuming additional
responsibilities while vacant positions sit idle for
long periods in order to economize.
-
Review Plan of Classified Positions~
The CSO would like to see a position review process
implemented through Human Resource Services. We further
recommend that employees and their supervisors review
job descriptions prior to annual review to ensure that
job duties are comparable to actual work performed. We
also recommend reclassification of positions where
workload exceeds expectations for the current position;
improving morale and customer service.
-
Merit Funds (if funds become available) ~
The CSO would like to see a merit system defined and
applied as other state agencies have implemented for
their employees’ performance reviews. If a merit system
is implemented campus-wide, CSO recommends that all
contingency groups—classified staff, professional staff
and faculty—are equally represented in any
decision-making for the distribution of merit funds.
-
Safety~
With the opening of the Activity Center,
the new Nursing & Health Science building and the new
dorms, we recognize the additional burden placed on
security to maintain a safe environment on campus and in
off-campus student housing. We will continue to support
the need for permanent security personnel and clerical
assistance, for the benefit of staff and students alike.
With the continual growth of LCSC’s population it is
highly important to ensure the safety of faculty, staff
and students. CSO also supports the following safety
measures:
o
The maintenance
and inspection of smoke, fire, and security alarms, as well
as campus elevators, is a top priority.
o
Expanding upon
last year’s award for a video surveillance system on campus
(including residence hall cameras).
o
To maintain a
high level of security, the CSO would like to see a safety
initiative brought forth by the Security Office.
o
The purchase of
two electronic-reader boards will be in the best interest of
Lewis-Clark State College for accurate messages of emergency
situations.
o Defensive action
by Information Technology is essential to create a redundant
path from the campus to the public Internet so that
enterprise systems (LCSC web, Blackboard, and email) can
continue if something happens to
the
primary facility in the Sam Glenn Complex.
-
Classified Staff Search/Hiring Policy~ Lewis-Clark State
College seeks to provide a high level of responsive
service in meeting the needs of students, faculty and
staff and the general public. To accomplish this
mission, it is the policy of the College to provide a
total compensation system that attracts and retain
s
employees. Recognizing and rewarding employees for
performance in the achievement of service is a
foundation for consistent fair and equitable
compensation. The CSO believes that with a new
institutional policy that governs the search and hiring
process, any previous inconsistencies will be eliminated
and will create a fairness for all that apply.
Exceptions to the policy should occur only in emergency
situations. It is recommended that Lewis-Clark State
College continue to follow the state guidelines when
hiring new classified staff members; and recommend that
the proposal of minimum pay at 80% of midpoint become
policy which is consistent with the Salary
Administration Guidelines as proposed by the
Compensation Review Committee.
Please note that due to the
State Controller’s Office ruling on benefits for part-time
employees, we recommend that all part-time positions being
requested for FY-10 (and beyond) be evaluated to ensure that
current and future part-time employees are not affected by a
reduction/decline of appropriate benefits.
There are currently 11
classified positions asked for in the UAP process. The CSO
supports all of the CSO personnel initiatives that have been
submitted through the UAP process for funding. When the
current economic situation confronted by the State of Idaho
improves, the CSO would be amenable in supporting the
addition or increase in hours for the requested positions.
At this time, the CSO highly recommends placing more
emphasis and attention on the current employees instead of
creating new positions. We realize that the entire campus
will have to lend support during this difficult financial
period and provide assistance when needed. Therefore,
please consider a thorough review of each classified members
responsibilities and recognize their hard work and
dedication to Lewis-Clark State College.
- Professional/Staff Development~
According to
PG-09-54, Employee Professional Development and
Training (PDT) Process, professional development
will be made available to all LCSC employees. The PDT
committee has implemented the training program and this
type of training will be possible if supervisors not
only allow, but also encourage classified staff to
attend available training. It should also be noted that
numerous divisions/departments referenced funds targeted
for faculty/professional staff professional development,
but division/department allocated funds should also be
made available to classified staff.
-
Equipment Upgrades~ We
strongly support funding of programs that will help to
increase the use and availability of Information
Technology across the campus community and its outreach
centers as outlined in PG-09-13. As we stated last
year, the image and viability of our college is directly
related to the education offered to our students, and
instruction delivered on out-dated equipment is
detrimental to the overall education of our students.
This includes all students, not just those limited to
the central campus in Lewiston. As our campus community
grows, and we see an increase of students taking
advantage of both our distance learning and outreach
center services, we must ensure that they receive the
same level of service that is offered to those on
campus.
-
Salary Compensation~
We are especially pleased with the
progress of the Compensation Review Committee toward
salary equity for our employees and greatly appreciate
the administration’s commitment to this issue
(PG-09-09). We look forward to our continuing efforts
in this endeavor. With the recent increase in the base
pay enacted by the Division of Human Resources, the
compression issue will only increase if we are not
proactive in confronting this issue. We continue to
support a long-term plan that defines how the college
will address salary inequities and compression each year
without total dependence on funding from the
legislature.
-
Motor Pool Vehicles~
We strongly support a long-term
plan that includes a periodic maintenance review and/or
replacement of motor pool vehicles to ensure for the
safety of all employees, students and the community. We
recognize that funding may not be available to provide
for increased maintenance and/or replacement costs of
vehicles, but we feel that this is a college-wide safety
issue that should receive departmental and
administrative support.
- Energy and Operating Efficiencies~ We
understand and recognize the need to identify
opportunities to reduce energy use and/or increase
efficiency, and reduce other operating costs at
Lewis-Clark State College as outlined in PG-09-61. We
support the broad scope of the task force which has been
charged with reviewing a multitude of options for energy
and operating efficiencies. The task force will also
follow the plan as outlined in the Governor’s Executive
Order on trip reduction and making commuting more
efficient. We appreciate the opportunity to be a
contributor on this task force and hope that we will
continue to provide valuable input in the future.
-
Advertising Plan~ We recognize the
need and support the implementation of the college-wide
marketing plan to advertise our college. With the
increased competition from other colleges, it is
imperative that we stay viable within the college
market, and this will only be achieved through a
concerted effort by marketing personnel and additional
funding.
-
Accreditation, Recruitment and Retention~
In an on-going attempt to stay
competitive with the colleges within the state of Idaho,
we support the electronic method of payment of tuition
which was recently implemented. This procedure will
benefit LCSC students as well as the staff members of
the Controller’s Office. Moving to the E-Commerce method
of business has provided Lewis-Clark State College with
a more streamlined look that will assist in recruiting
students, primarily in rural areas where it is difficult
to travel in to the central campus in Lewiston to pay
their student fees. It will benefit LCSC in retaining
their current student population as well as hold a
higher level of compliance in providing LCSC students
with accurate information regarding their financial aid
award and residuals, and an updated running balance of
their tuition. E-Commerce will assist the Controller’s
Office, and Lewis-Clark State College as a whole, in
staying in alignment with the standards of the Northwest
Commissions on Colleges and Universities as well as
protecting each student to a higher standard of
privacy. We recognize the magnitude of making a
superior first impression with potential students.
Therefore, we support the request for expansion of
hardware related to LCSC’s student registration system
to fully support Student Services’ recruitment tactics
related to STAR.
We believe that LCSC is a great place to
work. LCSC provides a great holiday work schedule, the
opportunity to attend Academic and Professional-Technical
classes at a reduced fee, professional development courses
at no cost, and an opportunity to create unity among our
constituency groups. These are great non-monetary benefits
that we receive as employees. With the bleak financial
future our college will be facing, increased non-monetary
benefits could help with low morale as the economic crisis
unfolds. Several examples for non-monetary benefits that
might be considered are noted:
o
Increased
professional development courses through the PDD program.
o
Additional
encouragement from our supervisors to work towards a degree
and attend classes offered on
campus.
o
Continued
support for the campus holiday party.
o
If
possible, offer the employees the option of a 4-day workweek
to help with costs associated
with traveling to work (aligns with our support of PG-09-61,
Energy and Operating Efficiencies).
The CSO
is always concerned that low employee morale among
classified staff continues to be an issue. Workload,
salaries, and compression are significant concerns with
regard to morale. Due to the lack of regular pay raises we
have adapted a “do more with less” culture, and while
employees have stepped up to this challenge, it has created
tension among staff. The Classified Staff Organization will
continue to support the Compensation Review Committee in
their efforts to formulate strategies for non-monetary
compensation that will benefit all employees.
Respectfully submitted by:
Patty Leonard
Lucy Loewen
Cindy Patterson
Gloria Baugh
Kris-Ann Hight
Connie Hallen |